Skip to main content

Acetylcholine Receptors

High Yield Facts ⭆ Acetylcholine released in postsynaptic cleft and binds to α-subunit of acetylcholine receptor. When acetylcholine bind a nicotinic AchR, a conformational change occurs in the receptor, resulting in the formation of an ion pore. The opening of a ion pore produces a rapid increase in the cellular permeability of sodium and calcium ions, resulting in the depolarisation and excitation of the muscle cell. It activate the sodium channel and depolarizes the nerve fibers. Direction of transmission of nerve impulse from postsynaptic junction to nerve fibers.

Question

Which of the following ion channel opens, when acetylcholine (ACh) binds to acetylcholine receptor (AChR) at postsynaptic junction?
  1. Potassium (K)
  2. Chloride (Cl)
  3. Calcium (Ca)
  4. Sodium (Na)

Acetylcholine Receptors

Two types of Acetylcholine Receptor:
  1. Muscarinic Type: G-Protein Coupled Receptor. Slow metabolic response through intracellular secondary messenger system involving an increase of intracellular calcium to transmit signals inside cells. Smooth muscle, Heart muscle.
  2. Nicotinic Type: Ligand-Gated Ion Channel. Fast synaptic transmission of the neurotransmitter. Neuromuscular Junctions, Brain.
Nicotinic Type Acetylcholine Receptors may be:
  1. Neuronal Type:
  2. Muscle Type: Neuromuscular Junctions

Reference:

  • Sargent, Peter B. "The diversity of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors." Annual review of neuroscience 16.1 (1993): 403-443.
  • Caulfield, Malcolm P., and Nigel JM Birdsall. "International Union of Pharmacology. XVII. Classification of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors." Pharmacological reviews 50.2 (1998): 279-290.

[Answer is D. Na channel]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Neurology: Self-Assessment

✍️ Neurology: Self-Assessment || Stroke || Part 02 || Dear Neurology Aspirants! Please! Watch the video for Self-Assessment. The assessment video contains 30 questions from the Chapter: Stroke. The video used objective questions from “The Neurology: Self-Assessment & Review" by Dr. Sunil Kumar. Hope! This will help you to manage your time in the examination hall. Best of Luck!

Kennedy Disease

Multiple Choice Questions in Neurology: True and False statements about Kennedy Syndrome: CAG repeat Gynecomastia Testicular atrophy Peripheral neuropathy Ocular muscle involvement Kennedy's Disease Inheritance X-linked recessive disorder Trinucleotide repeat: CAG gene Clinical Features Slowly progressive limb-girdle type muscle weakness Slowly progressive bulbar dysfunction Early tremor Muscle cramps Fasciculations Marked abnormal sensory nerve conduction study Degeneration of both motor and sensory neurons Lower motor neurons signs Elevated serum creatine kinase Abnormal sex hormone levels Gynecomastia Testicular atrophy Diabetes mellitus Note: Extraocular muscles are spared. References: Fischbeck, K. H. "Kennedy disease." Journal of inherited metabolic disease 20.2 (1997): 152-158. Sperfeld, Anne D., et al. "X-linked bulbospinal neuronopathy: Kennedy disease." Archives of Neurology 59.12 (2002): 1921-1926. [Answers are A. CAG repeat-True, B. Gynecomastia-True

Cerebellar Historical Facts

✍️ Introduction: When you try to kiss someone, do you know which brain part decides the speed, distance and force of lip movement during a kiss? The best kiss is nothing but a fine coordinated movement of orbicularis oris muscle. Now you are thinking, who controls the coordinated movement of the lip? It is cerebellum! ✍️ Question: Who said - “rate, range, and force of movement is governed by the cerebellum. Sir Joseph Babinski Gillman & Gillman Gordon Holmes Sir Charcot ✍️ Explanation: The cerebellum monitors the rate, range, and force of the movement. The cerebellar diseases do not cause motor weakness but it produces unilateral in-coordination. According to Gordon Holmes, cerebellum controls the “rate, range, and force” of movement. ✍️ Answer(s): 3. Gordon Holmes ✍️ Reference: Holmes, Gordon. “The Croonian Lectures on the Clinical Symptoms of Cerebellar Disease and Their Interpretation. Lecture II. 1922.” Cerebellum (London, England), vol. 6, no. 2, 2007, pp. 148–53; discussion